By Gary L. Yates
Newspaper coverage of gang-related fatalities in California paints a portrait of
overwhelming and uncontrollable violence. Editorial pages describe communities
affected by violence as bullet-ridden war zones that sound like Baghdad.
Community members are portrayed as helpless victims. Labeled as "urban
terrorists," perpetrators of violence are cast as monsters beyond reform. And
the only proposed cures for this epidemic are more police officers and more
prisons.
Missing from this picture is the proven effectiveness of public health
strategies to eradicate the breeding grounds of crime. Statistics show that
violence prevention programs save lives and tax dollars — up to $3 for every $1
invested, according to a 1998 Rand report.
Here in Southern California, three visionary community leaders — recipients of
the California Wellness Foundation's 2003 California Peace Prize — have created
violence prevention programs that produce positive results.
After losing his 20-year-old son, Tariq, to gang violence, Azim Khamisa reached
out in forgiveness to Ples Felix, the grandfather and guardian of his son's
assailant. As founder and president of the Tariq Khamisa Foundation in San
Diego, Khamisa developed a program for youths in which he and Felix speak about
their experience.
The program explores the consequences of violence and discusses ways of dealing
with conflict in nonviolent ways. A survey of elementary school children in San
Diego showed that before Khamisa's program, only seven percent said they believed that
joining a gang was dangerous. After the program, that figure soared to 92 percent.
In Los Angeles, former gang member Bo Taylor founded Unity One, a street
ministry that offers job opportunities and life-management skill training to
formerly incarcerated youths. During the last four years, Unity One has helped
more than 1,900 inmates at the Pitchess Detention Center learn how to interact
with inmates of different backgrounds and gang affiliations.
As founder and executive director of the Community Coalition in South Los
Angeles, Karen Bass has led successful community-based anti-violence campaigns
since 1990. Acting on research showing that communities with a greater density
of businesses selling alcohol have a higher risk of violence, Bass' organization
prevented the rebuilding of 150 liquor stores after the 1992 civil strife. The
coalition worked with business owners to transform more than 40 of these sites
into grocery stores, coin laundries and other community services.
These are just a few of the successful violence prevention strategies that have
helped stem the tide of violent activity. Clearly, the current system is flawed.
A Little Hoover Commission report points to the ineffectiveness of California's
$1.4-billion parole system, in which parole violators account for two-thirds of
newly incarcerated inmates.
As California faces a daunting state budget deficit, tough decisions will have
to be made about the most effective allocation of resources for violence
prevention programs. Arnold Schwarzenegger's advocacy of last year's Proposition
49, which sought additional funds for after-school programs for at-risk youths,
was a step in the right direction.
Covering violent crime exclusively from a law enforcement perspective is the
shortest route to an attention-grabbing headline. But reporters and editors also
have a responsibility to investigate the causes of violence and to inform the
public of prevention programs. By broadening the coverage of violence to include
a social and environmental perspective, the media can help us improve the
health, safety and prosperity of our communities.
Author Gary L. Yates is the president and chief executive of the California
Wellness Foundation, which has funded violence prevention programs over the last
11 years.
Copyright (c) 2003 by the Independent Sector. Posted with permission on
www.tcwf.org. This article may not be
published, reposted, or redistributed without express permission from the
Independent Sector.